Friday, July 19, 2019
Satan :: essays research papers
Apple has two lawsuits pending that involve rumor-tracking Web sites. In Apple Computer v. Doe No. 1, et al. (or Apple v. Does for short), the company is suing up to 25 unnamed individuals for misappropriation of trade secretsââ¬âspecifically, leaking Appleââ¬â¢s confidential information about an unreleased audio product code-named ââ¬Å"Asteroidâ⬠to Think Secret, AppleInsider, and Jason Oââ¬â¢Gradyââ¬â¢s PowerPage. As part of the discovery process, Apple obtained subpoenas for all three sites for any and all information related to ââ¬Å"Asteroid,â⬠including the identity of all people who leaked the information, or communications that might reveal said identities. None of the sites is a defendant in the Does suit, though Apple has made clear that they could be named as defendants if evidence shows that they knowingly published Appleââ¬â¢s trade secrets (and Think Secret is a defendant in a second lawsuit not related to ââ¬Å"Asteroidâ⬠). Both Think Secret and AppleInsider have their own e-mail service, so obtaining information about their e-mail records and messages would require subpoenaing the sites themselves, invoking difficulties about journalist privileges. When Apple learned that PowerPage used an external e-mail provider, the companyââ¬â¢s legal team found its path of least resistance. Nfox has gone beyond refusal to contest the subpoenaââ¬âthe ISP refused to promise Oââ¬â¢Grady that it would not comply with the subpoena before appeals were exhausted. Thatââ¬â¢s when the Electronic Frontier Foundation, representing the three sites, went to court seeking a protective order on Oââ¬â¢Gradyââ¬â¢s behalf to prevent Nfox from turning over the information to Apple. On March 4, lawyers for Apple and for the three subpoenaed sites met in the San Jose courtroom of Superior Court Judge James P. Kleinberg. They were arguing over the sitesââ¬â¢ motion for a protective order barring Nfox from honoring Appleââ¬â¢s subpoenas. It was an uphill battle, because one day earlier, Judge Kleinberg tentatively ruled in Appleââ¬â¢s favor. On March 11, the Judge formalized his preliminary decision, denying the motion for the protective order, leaving Nfox free to honor Appleââ¬â¢s subpoenas and turn over all information from Oââ¬â¢Gradyââ¬â¢s e-mail related to ââ¬Å"Asteroid,â⬠including that which may identify the person who sent it to the sites. In the 13-page ruling, Kleinberg essentially told the three sites (the ones who moved to have the subpoenas quashed, hence their reference as movants in the decision) that their status as journalists does not matterââ¬âif they had Pulitzer Prizes, theyââ¬â¢d still have to honor the subpoenas. Trade Secrets
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.